On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Pavel Fedin <p.fe...@samsung.com> wrote: > Hello! > >> Ignoring legacy, the ideal naming scheme would be: >> >> qemu-system-arm >> aarch64-linux-user >> aarch32-linux-user > > You know, i rethought. Actually, the question concerns only "virt" machine, > because for other real machines the CPU should be the same as on real HW, and > this is no question. Shouldn't our default for "virt" be just "host" ? This > would eliminate all ambiguity i believe... >
What's it then meant to do for TCG (where the host could be anything)? And I think this is still an issue as it will be a functional diff between qemu-system-arm and qemu-system-aarch64 breaking compatability between the too and forever committing us to have to maintain two builds. Regards, Peter > Kind regards, > Pavel Fedin > Expert Engineer > Samsung Electronics Research center Russia > > >
