On 08/05/2015 14:34, Andreas Färber wrote: > > > Objection. None of the QOM patches have been reviewed by me and you knew > > > I would be back today. > > > > No, I didn't. I didn't even know you were away, I thought you were > > simply busy with something else. > > On the QOM CPU link<> thread that you participated in.
Sorry I missed that. > Btw I see no reason to add artificial link<> properties for ".." at all, > we should simply implement that as part of path resolution rather than > wasting memory with pointers to self. Well, "ls -al" shows "." and "..". But I'll implement object_property_add_const_link without using ".", so that discussion can be bypassed. Paolo
