Thanks for your input.

So I changed it to:
1. Only call bdrv_flush when bdrv_pwrite was successful
2. Only if bdrv_flush was unsuccessful that the return value of
vdi_co_write is updated.
In this way we try to avoid messing up any potential return value checks
possible while still propagating bdrv_flush errors.
That return value was a catch and I admit I'm no pro with the return value
convention in QEMU. bdrv_pwrite doesn't return the same value as
bdrv_pwrite_sync I assume (they do return negative values when fail, but
different values when successful)
---


Signed-off-by: Zhe Qiu <address@hidden>

>From 19b2fabbe00765b418362d8c1891f266091621f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: phoeagon <address-hidden>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 01:09:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] block/vdi: Use bdrv_flush after metadata updates

In reference to
b0ad5a455d7e5352d4c86ba945112011dbeadfb8~078a458e077d6b0db262c4b05fee51d01de2d1d2,
metadata writes to qcow2/cow/qcow/vpc/vmdk are all synced prior to
succeeding writes.

---
 block/vdi.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/vdi.c b/block/vdi.c
index 5d09b36..54a5fa8 100644
--- a/block/vdi.c
+++ b/block/vdi.c
@@ -713,7 +713,11 @@ static int vdi_co_write(BlockDriverState *bs,
         logout("will write %u block map sectors starting from entry %u\n",
                n_sectors, bmap_first);
         ret = bdrv_write(bs->file, offset, base, n_sectors);
+        if (!(ret < 0)) {
+            int flush_ret = bdrv_flush(bs->file);
+            if (flush_ret < 0)
+                ret = flush_ret;
+        }
     }

     return ret;
-- 
2.4.0

Reply via email to