On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:06:24PM +0000, Riku Voipio wrote:
> From: Juha Riihimäki <juha.riihim...@nokia.com>
>
> modified the arm disassembler to include the opcode binary representation
> along
> with the symbolic disassembly.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@nokia.com>
> Signed-Off-By: Juha Riihimäki <juha.riihim...@nokia.com>
> ---
> arm-dis.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm-dis.c b/arm-dis.c
> index 4fb899e..2b37c24 100644
> --- a/arm-dis.c
> +++ b/arm-dis.c
> @@ -4101,8 +4101,14 @@ print_insn_arm (bfd_vma pc, struct disassemble_info
> *info)
> In such cases, we can ignore the pc when computing
> addresses, since the addend is not currently pc-relative. */
> pc = 0;
> -
> - printer (pc, info, given);
> + if (size == 2) {
> + info->fprintf_func(info->stream, "[%04lx] ",
> + ((unsigned long)given) & 0xffffffff);
Is the mask here correct? As far as I understand, we only want to keep
16 bits here.
> + } else {
> + info->fprintf_func(info->stream, "[%08lx] ",
> + ((unsigned long)given) & 0xffffffff);
> + }
> + printer (pc, info, given);
>
> if (is_thumb)
> {
> --
> 1.6.5
>
>
>
>
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
