On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:29:11PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 04/07/2010 04:56 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Sorry, I haven't find time to review it in details. Would also be nice > > if someone can try it on an hppa machine, and ack it. > > I got an ack against v3 here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-03/msg01214.html > > This isn't just written to a spec, I do have access to an hppa machine: > > r...@dingo:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > cpu family : PA-RISC 2.0 > cpu : PA8600 (PCX-W+) > cpu MHz : 552.000000 > model : 9000/785/J6000 > model name : Duet W+ > hversion : 0x00005d40 > sversion : 0x00000491 > I-cache : 512 KB > D-cache : 1024 KB (WB, direct mapped) > ITLB entries : 160 > DTLB entries : 160 - shared with ITLB > bogomips : 1101.00 > software id : 2011956991 > > Test results for linux-user-test-0.3: > > ok: i386 arm armeb sparc ppc mips mipsel > bad: sparc32plus ppc64abi32 sh4 sh4eb x86_64 > > Of course, sparc32plus doesn't work on an i386 host either -- I think > the implementation of fstat is wrong. > > I don't have any system emulations set up on the hppa machine yet. >
It might be really interesting to also test qemu-system, as it usually catches a lot more bugs. This is especially given that your patch changes system emulation only parts. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
