On 16/04/2015 15:02, Peter Lieven wrote: >>> >> Also, I think it is iscsi_co_generic_cb that should set >> force_next_flush, so that it is only set on failure. Not really for the >> optimization value, but because it's clearer. > > I don't get what you mean with it should only "set on failure". > My approach would be to add a flag to the iTask that the command > requires to set force_flush after successful completion. Is it that > what you mean?
Set on success. Lack of sleep. Paolo
