On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:52:44PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 23/03/2015 15:11, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > Depends on the exact maintainer picking up your series. > > > > ... Now good luck figuring out who that's going to be :) > > > > (I ran "scripts/get_maintainer.pl" on a squashed diff for this series. > > It named only Paolo, but for the wrong reason: "vl.c" matched "Main > > loop" from the MAINTAINERS file. fw_cfg has no dedicated owner, apparently.) > > Gerd replied with "Looks good to me", so I think it should go through > him or through mst.
I'm guessing I'll send out a v4 of this series (for context, see http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-03/msg04586.html) once 2.3 is out and the code freeze is over. In the mean time, the commit log for 3a5c76ba mentions "the fw_cfg documentation". Would it make sense for me to re-send just 1/5 ("fw_cfg: add documentation file") to actually provide the above-mentioned documentation file with 2.3, leaving only patches 2..5 (the actual code changes, subject to the freeze) for 2.4 resubmission ? Thanks, --Gabriel
