On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:20:00PM +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > Hi, all > > Regarding too large qcow2 image, e.g., 2TB, > so long disruption happened when performing snapshot, > which was caused by cache update and IO wait.
I have CCed Kevin Wolf, the qcow2 maintainer. > perf top data shown as below, > PerfTop: 2554 irqs/sec kernel: 0.4% exact: 0.0% [4000Hz cycles], > (target_pid: 34294) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 33.80% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_cache_do_get > 27.59% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_cache_put > 15.19% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_cache_entry_mark_dirty > 5.49% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] update_refcount > 3.02% libpthread-2.13.so [.] pthread_getspecific > 2.26% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] get_refcount > 1.95% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] coroutine_get_thread_state > 1.32% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount > 1.20% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qemu_coroutine_self > 1.16% libz.so.1.2.7 [.] 0x0000000000003018 > 0.95% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_update_cluster_refcount > 0.91% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_cache_get > 0.76% libc-2.13.so [.] 0x0000000000134e49 > 0.73% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] bdrv_debug_event > 0.16% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] pthread_getspecific@plt > 0.12% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore > 0.10% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] vga_draw_line24_32 > 0.09% [vdso] [.] 0x000000000000060c > 0.09% qemu-system-x86_64 [.] qcow2_check_metadata_overlap > 0.08% [kernel] [k] do_blockdev_direct_IO > > If expand the cache table size, the IO will be decreased, > but the calculation time will be grown. > so it's worthy to optimize qcow2 cache get and put algorithm. > > My proposal: > get: > using ((use offset >> cluster_bits) % c->size) to locate the cache entry, > raw implementation, > index = (use offset >> cluster_bits) % c->size; > if (c->entries[index].offset == offset) { > goto found; > } > > replace: > c->entries[use offset >> cluster_bits) % c->size].offset = offset; > ... > > put: > using 64-entries cache table to cache > the recently got c->entries, i.e., cache for cache, > then during put process, firstly search the 64-entries cache, > if not found, then the c->entries. > > Any idea? > > Thanks, > Zhang Haoyu >
pgpudKdIpGDV6.pgp
Description: PGP signature