On 04/01/2010 10:54 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 4/1/10, Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
On 03/31/2010 05:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
While it probably make sense to achieve this goal, it doesn't mean it
should be done the dirty way.
For example it is known for a lot of time that the solution for the
bswap in the device code is to add a bus model doing the byteswapping.
Removing the #ifdef by deciding "this device will only be big/little
endian" doesn't seem to go in the right direction.
Yeah, I'm having real trouble with the KVM regression. I thought I had it
fixed but linux-user really made a mess of things. There's no simple
solution that doesn't require quite a bit of refactoring which I'd rather do
in a less ugly way. We've already been discussing getting rid of all the
kvm_enabled() stuff and I think doing that properly is going to be needed to
handle this correctly.
Strange, does linux-user use kvm.h (indirectly)?
Yes, because various things in target-i386 use kvm.h.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
