11.03.2015 11:46, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: [] > ... Rather than saying > > "Oh well. I've no idea how this code has been accepted. > It is absolute crap." > > it would be nice if we take up specific issues, w.r.t the os/cpu > combination where we are running into issues, we may be able to fix this > easily.
The specific issues were outlined and partially fixed by the v3 patchset. This is, for example, the way v9fs_request() is called with arguments for v9fs_marshal function, which are ignored and new arguments are constructed inside _request. That's what I refer to when saying it is a complete crap. Do you not agree? :) [] > Note: At this point i haven't picked any of the patches posted, so if > you have anything specific you want me to take up, please repost then > with correct version number (v1, v2...) I sent a v3 (last) with correct version number, it has just 3 (rather big) patches: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/324157 . Thanks, /mjt
