* zhanghailiang (zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com) wrote:
> On 2015/3/2 23:56, Eric Blake wrote:
> >On 02/27/2015 07:54 PM, zhanghailiang wrote:
> >>On 2015/2/28 0:48, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>>On 02/26/2015 11:19 PM, zhanghailiang wrote:
> >>>>The original 'status' is an open-coded 'str' type, convert it to use an
> >>>>enum type.
> >
> >>>>+# @MigState:
> >>>
> >>>Do we have to abbreviate? I guess leaving it like this makes the rest
> >>>of the existing code base have less churn (since it matches the spelling
> >>>of the enum that was previous interanl only), but it might look nicer as
> >>
> >>Yes, this is the reason ..., agreed, i don't like the abbreviate,
> >>But there is already a 'MigrationState' type defined:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >>So, what about MigrationStatus ? ;)
> >
> >That would be fine with me.
> >
>
> Bad news, this name has also been used :(
Hmm, how about 'MigrationStage' ?
Dave
>
> In hmp.c:
>
> typedef struct MigrationStatus
> {
> QEMUTimer *timer;
> Monitor *mon;
> bool is_block_migration;
> } MigrationStatus
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
