On 2015-02-27 at 16:44, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 27.02.2015 um 18:42 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:

An optimized fix could be to use a CoRwLock, then:


Note related to our previous discussion: why does the code use CoRwlock instead of CoRwLock? Should it be renamed before more code uses it?

Well, I'm simply not using it (in v3 at least...), so I hope I'll get away without touching that. :-)

Max

Reply via email to