Amit Shah wrote: > The number of ports on the source as well as the destination machines > should match. If they don't, it means some ports that got hotplugged on > the source aren't instantiated on the destination. Or that ports that > were hot-unplugged on the source are created on the destination.
Surely the set of guest-visible ids must match exactly and be checked (maybe mapped, if they were given in a different order), in which case counting the number of ports looks redundant. I.e. is this check hiding the omission of the proper one? -- Jamie
