On Tue, 02/24 10:35, Max Reitz wrote:
> bdrv_unref() can lead to bdrv_close(), which in turn will result in
> bdrv_drain_all(). This function will later be called blk_drain_all() and
> iterate only over the BlockBackends for which blk_is_inserted() holds
> true; therefore, bdrv_is_inserted() and thus quorum_is_inserted() will
> probably be called.
>
> This patch makes quorum_is_inserted() aware of the fact that some
> children may have been closed already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/quorum.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/quorum.c b/block/quorum.c
> index 7a75cea..5ae2398 100644
> --- a/block/quorum.c
> +++ b/block/quorum.c
> @@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static void quorum_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
>
> for (i = 0; i < s->num_children; i++) {
> bdrv_unref(s->bs[i]);
> + s->bs[i] = NULL;
Is quorum_is_inserted called by bdrv_close in this bdrv_unref? If yes, I think
unsetting s->bs[i] should happen before bdrv_unref(), so quorum_is_inserted
won't count this one again.
Fam
> }
>
> g_free(s->bs);
> @@ -1070,7 +1071,7 @@ static bool quorum_is_inserted(BlockDriverState *bs)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < s->num_children; i++) {
> - if (!bdrv_is_inserted(s->bs[i])) {
> + if (s->bs[i] && !bdrv_is_inserted(s->bs[i])) {
> return false;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
