On 02/17/2015 10:56 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
> In any case, since I was actually the one who re-invented it,
> and this code just moves it to another function, I think we
> can address it as a seperate patch and leave the PULL
> intact (unless there are other objections).

Agree that a separate cleanup patch would be okay.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to