On 15/02/2015 12:12, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 15 February 2015 at 03:02, David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > wrote: >> Godammit. Have I mentioned lately how much it pisses me off that we >> have various config symbols and it's never clear which ones make it >> into C and which are only in make. > > That does seem confusing. Is there a reason we can't have a > config-devices.h which gets created from config-devices.mak?
Blue Swirl opposed it because we already had qdev_try_create... The problem here was that CONFIG_PCI_HOTPLUG_OLD was in config-devices.mak but not a device. There were other cases before (CONFIG_FDT maybe?) but I think this was the last one. I'd just kill it at this point... Paolo
