02.02.2015 17:18, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> From 5b035df58f9f17e64b35311b6b5f55097c7f8ce1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Max Ostapenko <m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 12:03:20 +0400
> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user: wrong TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE value for some targets.
>
> Fix TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE calculation to match the way the kernel does it.
> Use different TARGET_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE for 32-bit and 64-bit targets.
I've applied your patch to -trivial. However, the patch has been whitespace-
damaged so I had to apply it manually - your mailer added several leading
spaces, changed tabs into spaces, and word-wrapped several lines. Please,
for the next time, send a patch over email to youself and verify if it
still applies to a clean branch -- before sending it to the list.
Note also that I used the original subject line of your patch, not the
subject line of this emai. Again, please ensure there's just one message
with one subject and date, not two ;)
Thanks,
/mjt
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com>
> ---
> linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> index ebb3be1..9ed6de8 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> @@ -655,7 +655,14 @@ typedef struct {
> #endif
>
> #define TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE 128
> -#define TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE ((TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE/sizeof(int)) - 3)
> +
> +#if TARGET_ABI_BITS == 32
> +#define TARGET_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE (3 * sizeof(int))
> +#else
> +#define TARGET_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE (4 * sizeof(int))
> +#endif
> +
> +#define TARGET_SI_PAD_SIZE ((TARGET_SI_MAX_SIZE - TARGET_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE) /
> sizeof(int))
>
> typedef struct target_siginfo {
> #ifdef TARGET_MIPS
