On 01/02/15 19:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:

> Le 01/02/2015 19:39, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit :
>> Currently the m48t59 device uses the hardware model in order to determine
>> whether the year value is offset from the hardware value. As this will
>> soon be required by the x59 model, change the year offset to a qdev
>> property and update the callers appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is it possible to use a 'base_year' property, like in the mc146818rtc
> device?
> Usual values will be 0 (for year 2000) and 1968 (for sun4m).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hervé

Hi Hervé,

Yes I could do this to match the mc146818rtc if that help makes
everything consistent. Can you clarify exactly how the base_year
wraparound works in the above example? (e.g. what happens for base_year
2001, and what are the maximum/minimum values that should be accepted
for the wraparound logic).

Also how should these patches get merged? According to get_maintainer.pl
this part of the tree feels particularly unloved, or would you now
consider yourself to be a reviewer/maintainer?


ATB,

Mark.


Reply via email to