On 02/02/2015 22:12, John Snow wrote: > > It comes in handy later for testing migration so I don't have to do a > lot of boilerplate for each instance, though it is just a convenience > subroutine with no logic of its own. > > I like to cut down on boilerplate as much as possible to expose the > logic of the test as much as possible. > > Have a suggestion for a better name, or are you very adamant about > culling it?
I'm adamant about culling it because I don't have a suggestion for a better name. In the long run, I think we should just have a qos_boot function that does everything including PCI scanning, mapping BARs and initializing devices. But we're of course very far from that. Paolo
