On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Leon Alrae wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Leon Alrae <leon.al...@imgtec.com>
> ---
Enthusiastically:
Reviewed-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <ma...@linux-mips.org>
However...
> diff --git a/target-mips/translate.c b/target-mips/translate.c
> index 635192c..77d89be 100644
> --- a/target-mips/translate.c
> +++ b/target-mips/translate.c
> @@ -4947,7 +4947,7 @@ static void gen_mfc0(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv arg, int
> reg, int sel)
> #if defined(TARGET_MIPS64)
> if (ctx->rxi) {
> TCGv tmp = tcg_temp_new();
> - tcg_gen_andi_tl(tmp, arg, (3ull << 62));
> + tcg_gen_andi_tl(tmp, arg, (3ull << CP0EnLo_XI));
> tcg_gen_shri_tl(tmp, tmp, 32);
... don't we need to do:
tcg_gen_andi_tl(arg, arg, ~(3ull << CP0EnLo_XI));
here and for EntryLo1 as well (for LPA-enabled processors)?
> tcg_gen_or_tl(arg, arg, tmp);
> tcg_temp_free(tmp);
And do we want to have CP0C3_LPA set in the few templates that do in the
first place? AFAICT we don't really implement LPA so this bit will
confuse software. Of course implementing it would be another option, not
very complicated AFAICS, and if we can track the requirement to update
MFC0 at that time, then the clean-up I mentioned above can be deferred
until then.
Maciej
