On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:42:56AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2015/1/27 22:40, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >Chen, Tiejun writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] libxl: add one
> >machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough"):
> >>On 2015/1/23 8:43, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> >>>On 2015/1/22 8:51, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> >>>>At this point I just concern here if we still use 'gfx_passthrou', at
> >>>>least it may look like a backward compatibility with older versions of
> >>>>qemu in Xen side, qemu-xen-traditional. But I'd like to follow your
> >>>>final option.
> >...
> >>>Any feedback to this option I should follow here?
> >>
> >>Ping...
> >
> >I think this is a question that qemu upstream should answer.
> >
>
> Actually this is just commented by Gerd in qemu upstream. So now looks in
> Xen side you guys don't have any objection to use 'igd-passthru' as well. If
> yes, I'm fine to adopt this.
>
Yes, we would like to stay in line with upstream.
Just remember to handle old option in libxl if your old option is already
released by some older version of QEMUs.
Wei.
> Thanks
> Tiejun
>
