On 24 January 2015 at 16:36, Greg Bellows <greg.bell...@linaro.org> wrote: > I understand what the code is doing, my point is that you rely on > arm_is_secure_below_el3 to deal with EL2 when you could have just as easily > checked for el<2. Not a big deal though.
Well, I rely on the architecture to tell me that it isn't possible for arm_is_secure_below_el3 to be true if we're in EL2. Otherwise there'd be a bug in that function... -- PMM
