Le 19/01/2015 16:01, Andreas Färber a écrit :
Also, wasn't Hervé's(?) plan to get rid of mem_base completely by always
passing a pointer to ISADevice/ISABus around? It should only be needed
when somewhere NULL is being passed, no?

Yes, I've a patch series which is removing the isa_mem_base variable. I'll send 
it on ML.
ISA functions already take either a ISABus or a ISADevice, so they are good.
Next step would be to allow multiple ISA busses in hw/isa/isa-bus.c

Regards,

Hervé


Reply via email to