On 31 December 2014 at 17:17, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > One thing I did notice in the dmesg: > > [ 35.798423] alg: hash: Test 1 failed for sha1-ce > [ 35.799135] 00000000: d3 5b 9a 85 7f 18 48 21 97 5c 12 72 a8 96 62 88 > [ 35.799815] 00000010: c3 d2 e1 f0 > [ 35.807121] alg: hash: Test 1 failed for sha224-ce > [ 35.807458] 00000000: 75 49 49 85 18 97 6f 0c a7 d3 c3 ee 54 5d b3 59 > [ 35.807910] 00000010: a0 97 b3 34 f8 9c ab c1 91 e1 24 9e > [ 35.814059] alg: hash: Test 1 failed for sha256-ce > [ 35.814450] 00000000: b9 cb b3 d4 f5 29 fa 2c 8f 9b 8e 67 e9 6d 24 9b > [ 35.814897] 00000010: 83 da e8 b1 ba 32 6c bb 4e 53 77 76 fc 11 e4 aa > [ 35.827619] alg: cipher: Test 1 failed on encryption for aes-ce > [ 35.828042] 00000000: ba 4a ec ea df 05 7d 76 56 af 92 77 5d 00 e0 90 > > ...does that happen on little endian TCG hosts too, or do we have > a bug in our encryption emulation?
It doesn't happen on LE TCG hosts. Joy :-) -- PMM
