okay, thank you, I think it is better for net and other feature with one virtio code set like linux.
On 2014-12-14 21:30, Yan Vugenfirer wrote: > Thanks! > > The fix is correct, but I am not sure this patch is needed. > This is a frozen part of the code with XP and Windows 2003 support for NetKVM > only. > > The library that is used for newer OSes and other drivers has this fix: > https://github.com/YanVugenfirer/kvm-guest-drivers-windows/commit/264f1b6c86f5eeca5e2c9fbd24e3de8dbd0bee1d > > In the NetKVM driver code itself we are testing for those conditions before > calling to add_buf (check ParaNdis_DoSubmitPacket function in > https://github.com/YanVugenfirer/kvm-guest-drivers-windows/blob/stable/NetKVM/NDIS5/Common/ParaNdis-Common.c#L1528). > > Best regads, > Yan. > >> On Dec 10, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Ting Wang <kathy.wangt...@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> In function vring_add_indirect, there is no limiti >> about free entry in vring. If vring is full, >> vq->num_free will be less than zero, and >> the address of vq->vring.desc becomes illegal. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ting Wang <kathy.wangt...@huawei.com> >> --- >> NetKVM/NDIS5/VirtIO/VirtIORing.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/NetKVM/NDIS5/VirtIO/VirtIORing.c >> b/NetKVM/NDIS5/VirtIO/VirtIORing.c >> index 90ace4c..0f3783c 100644 >> --- a/NetKVM/NDIS5/VirtIO/VirtIORing.c >> +++ b/NetKVM/NDIS5/VirtIO/VirtIORing.c >> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int vring_add_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq, >> return -1; >> } >> >> - if (va_indirect) >> + if (va_indirect && (out + in) > 1 && vq->num_free) >> { >> int ret = vring_add_indirect(_vq, sg, out, in, va_indirect, >> phys_indirect); >> if (ret >= 0) >> -- >> 1.8.5 >> >> > > > . >
