On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:46:23 +0100
Thomas Huth <th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > +static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t features, unsigned int
> > fbit)
> > +{
> > + assert(fbit < 32);
> > + return !!(features & (1 << fbit));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool virtio_has_feature(VirtIODevice *vdev, unsigned int
> > fbit)
> > +{
> > + return __virtio_has_feature(vdev->guest_features, fbit);
> > +}
> > +
>
> I've got to say that I'm a little bit unhappy with the naming of the
> functions - and in contrast to the Linux kernel code, I think it is
> also quite uncommon in the QEMU sources to use function names with
> double underscores at the beginning.
>
> Could you maybe rename the second function to "virtio_vdev_has_feature"
> instead? And then remove the double underscores from the first function?
Renamed the functions just like this.
