Only free qsb that qemu_bufopen allocated, and also allow qemu_bufopen accept qsb as input for write operation. It will make the API more logical: 1.If you create the QEMUSizedBuffer yourself, you need to free it by using qsb_free() but not depends on other API like qemu_fclose. 2.allow qemu_bufopen() accept QEMUSizedBuffer as input for write operation, otherwise, it will be a little strange for this API won't accept the second parameter.
This brings API change, since there are only 3 users of this API currently, this change only impact the first one which will be fixed in patch 2 of this patchset, so I think it is safe to do this change. 1 70 tests/test-vmstate.c <<open_mem_file_read>> return qemu_bufopen("r", qsb); 2 404 tests/test-vmstate.c <<test_save_noskip>> QEMUFile *fsave = qemu_bufopen("w", NULL); 3 424 tests/test-vmstate.c <<test_save_skip>> QEMUFile *fsave = qemu_bufopen("w", NULL); Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang <yan...@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> Cc: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> --- qemu-file.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-file.c b/qemu-file.c index f938e36..52f8d69 100644 --- a/qemu-file.c +++ b/qemu-file.c @@ -904,6 +904,7 @@ QEMUSizedBuffer *qsb_clone(const QEMUSizedBuffer *qsb) typedef struct QEMUBuffer { QEMUSizedBuffer *qsb; QEMUFile *file; + bool qsb_allocated; } QEMUBuffer; static int buf_get_buffer(void *opaque, uint8_t *buf, int64_t pos, int size) @@ -933,7 +934,9 @@ static int buf_close(void *opaque) { QEMUBuffer *s = opaque; - qsb_free(s->qsb); + if (s->qsb_allocated) { + qsb_free(s->qsb); + } g_free(s); @@ -972,12 +975,11 @@ QEMUFile *qemu_bufopen(const char *mode, QEMUSizedBuffer *input) } s = g_malloc0(sizeof(QEMUBuffer)); - if (mode[0] == 'r') { - s->qsb = input; - } + s->qsb = input; if (s->qsb == NULL) { s->qsb = qsb_create(NULL, 0); + s->qsb_allocated = true; } if (!s->qsb) { g_free(s); -- 1.9.1