On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Peter Maydell wrote: > Is there ever a situation where you would want to > resynchronise only one of these two things? If not, > why not just have one function for synchronising > softfloat state from the FCR?
Good point, I think these are safe and cheap enough to be always called together. It sounds like a good idea for a future improvement. Thanks! Maciej
