On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/11/2014 14:52, Peter Maydell wrote: > > It certainly seems pretty risky to introduce this change with > > only two weeks to go til release; I wouldn't want to merge it > > without a strong consensus from everybody involved that it > > really needed to go in for 2.2. > > I think there's consensus (you, Amit, me) that it should wait for 2.3. > > Paolo
I agree too. We can still iterate on it, and I'd like to merge early in 2.3 cycle. So please send comments.
