On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:22:57PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 November 2014 16:13, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:09:36PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > >>> > >>> > tcp_get_fds API discards fds if there's more than 1 of these. > >>> > >>> s/tcp_get_fds/tcp_get_msgfds/ (subject as well) > >> > >> Right. Too late as I sent this upstream :( > > > > Oh, now I see: you already sent this in a pull request, after less than > > 20 hours on list. Please don't do that except in dire emergency. It > > sabotages our review process. > > ...I haven't actually applied that yet, though. Since this > isn't a critical bugfix I think it would probably be reasonable > to respin the pull without this patch, so it has a bit more > chance for review. Since it's not a new feature there's no > need to rush to get it in before hardfreeze, right? > > -- PMM
Hi Peter, OK I backed that patch out and re-pushed. As other patches are unchanged, I don't want to re-do the pull request, it's just spam on list. Tag name is still for_upstream, new hash d43f0d641e366251bd9c63005241775f672bf3ec Thanks! -- MST
