On 10/30/14, 7:26 AM, "Amit Shah" <amit.s...@redhat.com> wrote:
>On (Thu) 16 Oct 2014 [08:53:52], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: >> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> >> >> The migration code now occupies a fair chunk of the top level .c >> files, it seems time to give it it's own directory. > >s/it's/its 6 out of 87 .c files, and approximately 370 blocks out of 2840 (based on du output). 13% is a "fair chunk"? But tidy organization is a good thing while needless renaming is not. The only goal that the suggested renames would appear to accomplish is additional obfuscation. How about just moving them into a subdirectory and leave their names alone?
