On 10/26/14 21:28, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello Guenter Roeck: > > I still shall try qemu and kernel distribution, next, since it can do > it successfully (whether 'sim' can be success or not). >
I got confirmation from microblaze members, at present, microblaze sim can not full simulate entire system, so I shall try qemu and kernel distribution for it (which can do full simulation for microblaze). I shall try my best to finish it within this month. Thanks. > But excuse me, maybe I can not finish microblaze qemu test within this > month, hope I can finish within next month (2014-11-30). > > Thank your information about qemu, again. > > > Thanks. > > On 10/22/2014 08:28 AM, Chen Gang wrote: >> OK, thanks, there are multiple branches in upstream qemu. Sorry >> for my original said, and I can only say: for upstream develop >> master branch, it does not support microblaze. >> >> Excuse me, I does not mainly focus on only using qemu, and I >> also found another easier way for test microblaze toolchain (use sim of >> binutils). So next, I will mainly focus on sim. >> >> I also met some issues for sim, but I guess, I can analyze it, >> maybe also have chances to make patch for it (that is the main >> reason why I want to focus on it). >> >> Thanks. >> >> Send from Lenovo A788t. >> >> >> >> >> >> Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:41:14PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>> On 10/21/14 12:37, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 10/20/2014 08:23 AM, Chen Gang wrote: >>>>> On 10/19/2014 10:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This doesn't use devicetree, but the configurations are known to be >>>>>> working >>>>>> with kernel releases all the way back to kernel version 3.10. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, really it is ! >>>>> >>>>> After try upstream qemu and upstream kernel, for me, neither them can >>>>> work well. For xilinx qemu with xilinux kernel, it should be well, >>>>> although I still met issue below, is what I have done incorrect? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Difficult to say. >>>> >>>> I use gcc 4.8.0 from kernel.org and qemu 2.1.2 with its default >>>> configuration >>>> for the microblaze big endian target. No idea if that makes a difference, >>>> but I would suggest to start with those. >>>> >>>> For microblazeel I use gcc 4.9.1 built with buildroot 2014.08 for both >>>> kernel and initramfs. Initramfs for that target is built from busybox. >>>> >>> >>> OK, thank you very much for your information. >>> >>> But sorry, I have to stop trying, because that is far from upstream qemu >>> and upstream kernel (at present, I have no enough time resource on it). >>> >>> My original goal is "use upstream microblaze qemu to test upstream gcc, >>> binutils and glibc of microblaze". And now I find another ways: "use sim >>> which is in upstream binutils to perform the related test". >>> >> You lost me. qemu 2.1.2 is the upstream qemu, and I do use upstream binutils >> (2.24 if I recall corectly) as well as upstream gcc and upstream kernel. >> Did I indicate otherwise in anything I said ? FWIW, should be able to use >> qemu from distributions without recompiling it. >> >> Thanks, >> Guenter >> > > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
