Why should get_maintainer bother if someone puts his name as maintainer
on an "Orphan" entry? Garbage in, email out. The results from the git
fallback are likely to be from someone doing sweeping changes on the
whole tree, and thus not really interesting.
Reported-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
index a3a16d8..6c5a73b 100755
--- a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
+++ b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
@@ -505,24 +505,6 @@ if ($web) {
exit($exit);
-sub range_is_maintained {
- my ($start, $end) = @_;
-
- for (my $i = $start; $i < $end; $i++) {
- my $line = $typevalue[$i];
- if ($line =~ m/^(\C):\s*(.*)/) {
- my $type = $1;
- my $value = $2;
- if ($type eq 'S') {
- if ($value =~ /(maintain|support)/i) {
- return 1;
- }
- }
- }
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
sub range_has_maintainer {
my ($start, $end) = @_;
@@ -602,7 +584,6 @@ sub get_maintainers {
$value_pd++ if (substr($value,-1,1) ne "/");
$value_pd = -1 if ($value =~ /^\.\*/);
if ($value_pd >= $file_pd &&
- range_is_maintained($start, $end) &&
range_has_maintainer($start, $end)) {
$exact_pattern_match_hash{$file} = 1;
}
--
1.8.3.1
