On 2014/10/16 20:02, zhanghailiang wrote:
> When do memory hotplug, if there is numa node, we should add
> the memory size to the corresponding node memory size.
>
> For now, it mainly affects the result of hmp command "info numa".
>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - reword the subject (Igor Mammedov)
> - turn query_numa_node_mem to void (Igor Mammedov)
> v4:
> - s/pc_dimm_stat_node_mem/numa_stat_memory_devices/ (Igor Mammedov)
> - rewrite numa_stat_memory_devices and this will also fix compile error for
> targets that don't support memory hotplug
> v3:
> - cold-plugged memory should not be excluded (Igor Mammedov)
> v2:
> - Don't modify the numa_info.node_mem directly when treating hotplug memory,
> fix the "info numa" instead (Igor Mammedov)
>
> Thanks for review!;)
> ---
> include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 1 +
> monitor.c | 6 +++++-
> numa.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> index 0037a69..ef5eaf4 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ typedef struct node_info {
> extern NodeInfo numa_info[MAX_NODES];
> void set_numa_nodes(void);
> void set_numa_modes(void);
> +void query_numa_node_mem(uint64_t *node_mem);
> extern QemuOptsList qemu_numa_opts;
> int numa_init_func(QemuOpts *opts, void *opaque);
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 2d14f39..d45b0a3 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -1949,7 +1949,10 @@ static void do_info_numa(Monitor *mon, const QDict
> *qdict)
> {
> int i;
> CPUState *cpu;
> + uint64_t *node_mem;
>
> + node_mem = g_new0(uint64_t, nb_numa_nodes);
> + query_numa_node_mem(node_mem);
> monitor_printf(mon, "%d nodes\n", nb_numa_nodes);
> for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
> monitor_printf(mon, "node %d cpus:", i);
> @@ -1960,8 +1963,9 @@ static void do_info_numa(Monitor *mon, const QDict
> *qdict)
> }
> monitor_printf(mon, "\n");
> monitor_printf(mon, "node %d size: %" PRId64 " MB\n", i,
> - numa_info[i].node_mem >> 20);
> + node_mem[i] >> 20);
> }
> + g_free(node_mem);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROFILER
> diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> index 3b98135..5b84ffb 100644
> --- a/numa.c
> +++ b/numa.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include "hw/boards.h"
> #include "sysemu/hostmem.h"
> #include "qmp-commands.h"
> +#include "hw/mem/pc-dimm.h"
>
> QemuOptsList qemu_numa_opts = {
> .name = "numa",
> @@ -315,6 +316,46 @@ void memory_region_allocate_system_memory(MemoryRegion
> *mr, Object *owner,
> }
> }
>
> +static void numa_stat_memory_devices(uint64_t *node_mem)
> +{
> + MemoryDeviceInfoList *info_list = NULL;
> + MemoryDeviceInfoList **prev = &info_list;
> + MemoryDeviceInfoList *info;
> +
> + qmp_pc_dimm_device_list(qdev_get_machine(), &prev);
> + for (info = info_list; info; info = info->next) {
> + MemoryDeviceInfo *value = info->value;
> +
> + if (value) {
> + switch (value->kind) {
> + case MEMORY_DEVICE_INFO_KIND_DIMM: {
I think this '{}' symbol is superfluous.
Best regards,
-Gonglei
