On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 14 September 2014 21:29, Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Peter Maydell
>> <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> The XtensaConfig structs will be defined but not used if they are
>>> for the opposite endianness from that of the binary being built;
>>> keep the compiler from complaining about this by marking them
>>> with the 'unused' attribute.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This works, although it's a tad ugly. If anybody wants to suggest
>>> something better...
>>
>> Fine for me.
>>
>>>  target-xtensa/core-dc232b.c | 2 +-
>>>  target-xtensa/core-dc233c.c | 2 +-
>>>  target-xtensa/core-fsf.c    | 2 +-
>>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks. I guess we could put this one in through
> -trivial ?

Yes, please.

> Patchwork url:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/389115/

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

Reply via email to