On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 14 September 2014 21:29, Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Peter Maydell >> <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> The XtensaConfig structs will be defined but not used if they are >>> for the opposite endianness from that of the binary being built; >>> keep the compiler from complaining about this by marking them >>> with the 'unused' attribute. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> This works, although it's a tad ugly. If anybody wants to suggest >>> something better... >> >> Fine for me. >> >>> target-xtensa/core-dc232b.c | 2 +- >>> target-xtensa/core-dc233c.c | 2 +- >>> target-xtensa/core-fsf.c | 2 +- >>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> > > Thanks. I guess we could put this one in through > -trivial ?
Yes, please. > Patchwork url: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/389115/ -- Thanks. -- Max