Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
> + bool one_message = false;
> + /* This looks good, but it's possible that the device loading in the
> + * main thread hasn't finished yet, and so we might not be in 'RUN'
> + * state yet.
> + * TODO: Using an atomic_xchg or something for this
This looks like a good match for QemuEvent. Or just mutex & condvar.
> + */
> + while (mis->postcopy_ram_state == POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_LISTENING) {
What if we had postcopy of something else than RAM? Can you remove the
"ram" part from the symbols that do not directly deal with RAM but just
with the protocol?
Paolo
> + if (!one_message) {
> + DPRINTF("%s: Waiting for RUN", __func__);
> + one_message = true;
> + }
> + }
> + }
