Il 29/09/2014 18:04, Benoît Canet ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:33:45PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 24/09/2014 17:21, Benoît Canet ha scritto:
>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benoît Canet <benoit.ca...@nodalink.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/qemu/throttle.h | 2 --
>>> include/qemu/timer.h | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/qemu/throttle.h b/include/qemu/throttle.h
>>> index 8f9e611..1c639d2 100644
>>> --- a/include/qemu/throttle.h
>>> +++ b/include/qemu/throttle.h
>>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>>> #include "qemu-common.h"
>>> #include "qemu/timer.h"
>>>
>>> -#define NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND 1000000000
>>> -
>>> typedef enum {
>>> THROTTLE_BPS_TOTAL,
>>> THROTTLE_BPS_READ,
>>> diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h
>>> index 5f5210d..0884e72 100644
>>> --- a/include/qemu/timer.h
>>> +++ b/include/qemu/timer.h
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>>> #include "qemu-common.h"
>>> #include "qemu/notify.h"
>>>
>>> +#define NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND 1000000000
>>> +
>>> /* timers */
>>>
>>> #define SCALE_MS 1000000
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>>
>> :)
>
> Two rev by for one commit are better than one but does this belong to
> the third commit ? :)
The rev-bys belong to the first and second. The third's on my list...
Paolo
