On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:01:11AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 September 2014 23:20, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:39:32PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> HCR.TGE isn't actually relevant for some exceptions > >> (eg SMC), and the HVC handling you have below > >> effectively ends up ignoring the route_to_el2 > >> information. That suggests to me that you should put > >> this code in a default: case in the switch below. > > > > I don't really test nor support TGE so I'll just drop the TGE part. > > I'd rather we just implemented it properly...
IMO, It's not about implementing it properly. It's about implementing the EL3/2 support incrementally. The spec is too big to add all the features at once. Cheers, Edgar
