On 02/23/2010 07:17 PM, Jay Foad wrote:
Can you try this patch:It works! Thanks.and if it works, possibly only each hunk of it?Just the first hunk: works! Just the second hunk: doesn't work Can you explain why the volatile is necessary? Or is it working around a problem with the compiler?
I don't know exactly without checking, but these were the main changes introduced by my 24ebf5f31a178051cff1a4aab5ba621037191577 patch. I'll send it out shortly.
Paolo
