On 09/17/2014 04:54 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > I am fine with adding such hooks, but please let's use a better, active > name. CPUClass is the struct name and cpu-exec is a file name; the hook > should say what it's doing, not where the code (used to) live(s). Just > exec_enter/exec_exit possibly?
cpu_exec is also the function name from which they're invoked, not just the file name. I can make the name change if you really prefer, but (perhaps obviously) I kinda like the current naming. r~
