Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> writes: > On Sat, 09/13 17:00, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Commit 2d246f0 introduced DriveInfo member enable_auto_del to >> distinguish DriveInfo created via drive_new() from DriveInfo created >> via qmp_blockdev_add(). The latter no longer exist. Drop >> enable_auto_del. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> --- >> blockdev.c | 11 +++-------- >> include/sysemu/blockdev.h | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c >> index 0d99be0..e218c59 100644 >> --- a/blockdev.c >> +++ b/blockdev.c >> @@ -90,16 +90,14 @@ void blockdev_mark_auto_del(BlockBackend *blk) >> DriveInfo *dinfo = blk_legacy_dinfo(blk); >> BlockDriverState *bs = blk_bs(blk); >> >> - if (dinfo && !dinfo->enable_auto_del) { >> + if (!dinfo) { >> return; >> } >> >> if (bs->job) { >> block_job_cancel(bs->job); >> } >> - if (dinfo) { >> - dinfo->auto_del = 1; >> - } >> + dinfo->auto_del = 1; >> } > > Looks good. > > Based on the explanation in the commit message of patch 18, previouly, > dinfo is always non-NULL, so enable_auto_del distinguishes whether the > device is created by drive_new() or qmp_blockdev_add().
Correct. > Now dinfo is NULL iff created by qmp_blockdev_add(), so > enable_auto_del is not necessary any more. Correct again. > If I'm reading correctly, the dropped two "if (dinfo.."'s are also redundant. Yes. Let me explain why. The two cases to distinguish are "created by drive_new()" and "created by qmp_blockdev_add()". Commit 2d246f0 introduced DriveInfo member enable_auto_del to exactly that. The code tests for "created by qmp_blockdev_add()" like this: dinfo && !dinfo->enable_auto_del Before PATCH 18, this was actually unnecessarily careful, because dinfo could never be null, but that's okay. PATCH 18 changes the "created by qmp_blockdev_add() case: now dinfo is null there. The test remains correct, only now its second rather than first part is unnecessary: dinfo now implies dinfo->enable_auto_del. Before PATCH 18 dinfo != NULL !dinfo->enable_auto_del && by drive_new() true false false by qmp_blockdev_add() true true true After PATCH 18 dinfo != NULL !dinfo->enable_auto_del && by drive_new() true false false by qmp_blockdev_add() false N/A false Oops. After PATCH 19 dinfo !dinfo by drive_new() true false by qmp_blockdev_add() false true Looks like I need to squash PATCH 19 into PATCH 18... Thanks for making me think! [...]