Il 14/09/2014 12:51, Gal Hammer ha scritto: >> >> I think because of this, it is a bit simpler to add the device >> optionally to the SSDT, similar to how the TPM is handled. > > Back to SSDT? Didn't you say something about migration issues that > prevent me from using SSDT because the table's data is modified?
I said you have to either: 1) Use the DSDT, with a dynamic _STA method. 2) Use the SSDT, and only add the device if the device is specified on the command line. This avoids the avoid migration issues. At this point the _STA method can be static. Using the DSDT is possible, it's just that you have to do it as well for Q35, and I think it is harder than moving it back to the SSDT. Sorry for not thinking earlier about the different chipsets. Paolo
