Am 20.02.2010 02:49, schrieb Juan Quintela: > Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: >> On 02/15/2010 10:19 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> The current implementation of alloc_refcount_block and grow_refcount_table >>> has >>> fundamental problems regarding error handling. There are some places where >>> an >>> I/O error means that the image is going to be corrupted. I have found that >>> the >>> only way to fix this is to completely rewrite the thing. >>> >>> Just sending as an RFC to the list hasn't generated a lot of comments (to be >>> precise, not a single one). This is a critical part of qcow2 and needs >>> reviews. >>> So let's try it another way: People in CC, please give it a review. Sooner >>> or >>> later some of you will need to do so anyway. >>> >> >> Should I apply this series? I still don't see any review comments. > > I sent review comments on the 18th. I expect Kevin to address them. I > talked with him on irc while doing the review (i.e. he knows about > them).
I was hoping for more comments as there were three more people in the CC list. But looks like they prefer reviewing the patches downstream. I'm going to send a v2 which addresses only your comments if I don't get any more comments soon. Kevin
