On 10 September 2014 11:12, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 September 2014 10:09, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 9 September 2014 20:20, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> There were previously questions about whether we should >>> have flash or RAM at the bottom, but I think it makes >>> sense just to have a "like vexpress" config with two >>> flash devices. This does make telling QEMU about backing >>> storage for the 2nd flash a little complicated, but I >>> think anybody seriously running a config like that will >>> be using the management tools layer anyhow. > >> You mean having to use -pflash and pad the images out to 64 MB? I >> wouldn't worry about that. > > More particularly that if you don't want to provide backing > storage for the first flash but only the second, you can't just > use pflash but have to use the longer -drive options. >
OK, I will drop this one from my series then.
