2010/2/16 Rob Landley <r...@landley.net>: > On Tuesday 16 February 2010 03:31:16 Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 16.02.2010, at 01:52, Rob Landley wrote: >> If swapping the parameter was the right solution I would've submitted a >> patch long ago :-). Unfortunately it's not as easy. > > I agree that making a single controller handle four drives is a _better_ fix. > (Somebody said that current Linux kernels notice the DMA failure and fall back > to PIO-ing the drive, or some such. I take it that MacOS doesn't?) > > I just want it fixed, and if that's the direction qemu would prefer to go on > that issue, I'd like to encourage that in any way I can. I just don' t know > how... > >> But the inlining is >> really only about simple commenting. It's a lot nicer to have context when >> you say "this doesn't make sense" or so :-). > > Understood. I can do that here in future. > >> Either way - it's good to see someone interested in the topic actually >> sending patches. Reviewing and commenting doesn't mean I don't like what >> you're doing. In this case it just means I'm pretty sure it doesn't solve >> the problem, but only the symptoms. > > Thanks. I'm interested, but overwhelmed. > > My FWL project is an attempt to make as many different targets as possible > work > the same way, generally under QEMU. This lets me regression test Linux and > uClibc and busybox and such across all of 'em. (Eventually from a nightly > cron job rebuilding everything from scratch on an 8-way server, with automatic > "git bisect" telling me what commit broke it.) > > So far I've got arm, mips, powerpc, and x86/x86-64 building little native > development environments, which can then natively build dropbear and strace > inside qemu (optionally calling out to the cross compiler via distcc). Each > of those has a working CPU emulation (with mmu) on a board with a network > card, three disks, at least 256 megs of memory, serial console, and clock > chip. > > I've also got a bunch of "sort of working, but not well enough to run builds > natively under" targets on top of that (arm big endian, sh4, sparc...)
What's not well enough on sparc? -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/