On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2014 01:58, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> > wrote: >> It's not really a common object > > In what sense isn't it a common object? It's only > compiled once, rather than per-target. We should > avoid moving object files from compiled-once > to compiled-per-target if we can... >
Yeh, I introduce the variation with address_space_memory reliance. CPU needs to see it for the default AR. It doesn't exist in user-mode though. Regards, Peter > thanks > -- PMM >
