On 1 September 2014 19:04, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 September 2014 19:50, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Also true; I thought about mentioning those but decided they >> were orthogonal. We should probably pull together a list >> of all the UEFI related QEMU patches and required work.
> By orthogonal, do you mean this bit still belongs in > arm_load_kernel(), and the reset handling should be adapted to call > arm_load_kernel() again in its entirety? I mean I think this bit is fine, that load_dtb() should put the DTB in a rom-blob, and that then there's no need to do anything on reset because the rom-blob's reset handling does it for us. (As I say, this also gets us correct handling of the DTB on reset in the -kernel case too.) -- PMM
