On 08/20/2014 09:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 20.08.14 12:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 07/17/2014 04:30 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>>>>>> No, you should politely bother them again. >>>>> >>>>> That does not seem helping though :-/ >>>> >>>> Sorry. :) >>>> >>>> Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can >>>> ack it. It looks good to me though. >>> >>> >>> Let me clarify things here. >>> >>> Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to >>> 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current upstream, >>> repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that >>> correct? >>> >>> This is my current set: >>> 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface >>> 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface >>> 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface >>> 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass >>> 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command >> >> >> Alex, ping. >> > > > Uh, what exactly do you expect from me? :)
No idea :) You could take patches to your tree. I do not understand what to do with this set now. Please help. Thanks. -- Alexey
