On 2014-08-19 06:08, Knut Omang wrote:
>> Are you depending on interrupt remapping? If not, my patches are a bit
>> hacky and may cause their own issues if you are unlucky.
>  
> It does not depend directly but interprets a NULL PciDevice pointer as
> the special bus number (0xff) for non-pci devices, so I have tried to

Yeah, this won't map nicely on future chipsets - unless we redefine
Q35_PSEUDO_XXX as VTD_PSEUDO_XXX, or so, and use the same values for all
of them. Or create an unconnected pseudo PCI bus for the chipset devices
that carry the pseudo bus number.

> take heights for that - I can rebase if so desired, but I would like to
> see the interrupt remapping emerge as well ;-)

Good, then we are already two ;). Let's get the baseline ready, then we
can discuss extensions like interrupt remapping.

Jan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to