On 18 August 2014 08:26, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> Oops, I mistakenly thought this check was happening at the >> flattened-ranges point, but it's done when a subregion is >> added to a container. Maybe you're right that we should be >> able to allow overlaps if the priorities are different and not >> otherwise, then. But I'd rather we actually did that rather than >> just removing the check completely. >> > > Right can we call it follow up though and get a merge on this one so > we can start fresh? With your new hierarchy problem we are just > compounding the reasons to get rid of this code.
That makes it harder to figure out whether we're still detecting the same set of problems with the new check, though. -- PMM
